BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

'GM OLD LOOK RECOGNITION GUIDE'
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Transit Bus Manufacturers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

T.D. - Et. Al. -

The tip to the California thinking, and the highway coaches built to satisfy local conditions? Get your own
State "Driver's Manual" for commercial vehicles. Consider what is required with Bridge Formula length,
weight, and axle spacing requirements.

The method, and what is now National law and regulation, dates to 1944. It roots in earlier efforts with
cargo carrier, C F W Y to make peace with Oregon State Legislature. At the time, the State had some very
good highway engineering people, all concerned with vehicles loadings, and related to specific designs of
equipment. As time went on, the method became more recognized and accepted, "...and the rest is history...".

The Bridge Formula method reduces to consideration of some vital design limits. Practice with it, and the
concerns of weights on axles, and spacing of axles are key. Experienced hands at it (as applies to cargo)
know: Watch the per axle weight loadings. There are limits to tire engineering and design which enter here.
Spacing out distances between axles is your friend.

In bus design, it is all the engineers can do, in a product which "...gets it right..." on the weight loadings per
axle. In a related, well meaning mentoring of an acquaintance, I can't get it through his head he is not going
to get a low profile steer axle tire on modern day low floor designs. Tire engineering can't deliver the tire product.

........................Vern....................


Last edited by HwyHaulier on Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q65A



Age: 66
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 1764
Location: Central NJ

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's definitely not an easy feat to engineer a vehicle that can meet all state and local requirements.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Q65A wrote:
It's definitely not an easy feat to engineer a vehicle that can meet all state and local requirements.

Q65A -

Indeed, it is so! For myself, I have never been happy with weight loadings on bus steer tires. In freight, it is commonplace
to play around with the sliding trailer tandems, and the tractor fifth wheel. Best result is to get the steer weight light. One
quickly comes to appreciate the advantages of long wheelbase power units, and "10'-2" spread axles on the trailer rear...

........................Vern......................
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q65A



Age: 66
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 1764
Location: Central NJ

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vern, you make a very good point. Truckers have more options to meet axle loading requirements than do busmen. Trucks can have sliding 5th wheels, sliding tandems etc. but the geomteries of bus axles are fixed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please to excuse if I should labor the obvious, but... The mechanical ploy with the "4801" and "C-49" types? It did throw more
weight on the rears, and take it off the steer axle. Both builders were pushing the letter of California Code of the time...

........................Vern..................
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q65A



Age: 66
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 1764
Location: Central NJ

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Precisely, all these engineering efforts were performed in order to comply with California's 18,000 pound axle loading requirement.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Q65A wrote:
Precisely, all these engineering efforts were performed in order to comply with California's 18,000 pound axle loading requirement.

Q65A -

Beins' I'm a Seasoned Coot, guess I get to ramble! <G> Yeah, I see the problem. Much Eastern and Central States bus
operations on City streets. Compare, a great deal of California work on STATE roads. At the same time as the "tweaked"
GM and MACK coaches, we were amidst various Bridge Formula wars.

The Carrier side, CAL Trucking Assn. and Western Highway Institute had the money for the big BUX lawyers who were
ready to enforce any point. So, had CAL PUC "caved" on the 18,000 lb. back axle for GREYHOUND, they would have had
to do it for all else, and the freight lines, too! Yet, here, it took weight off steer! (A heavy steer, with people on, remains
spooky, IMHO!)

That's the politics, and back rooms of the business, as I see it. So much of the "fan" element hardly does anything but
look at the equipment. Compare, look at the business, and a better understanding of why certain things are done...

...........................Vern..................
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q65A



Age: 66
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 1764
Location: Central NJ

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree completely, Vern. Fans can look but do little else; business must roll on Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
traildriver




Joined: 26 Mar 2011
Posts: 2452
Location: South Florida

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Then there's the story of the (carrier name deleted) driver coming to the NJTP toll booth in his new PD4903. Back then we had charge cards to have validated at the entry booth, and collected by the exit booth.
Eagle and Scenicruiser driver's used the the ones with the three stripes (signifying the number of axles), and the 4104, 4106, and Suburban driver's used the cards with the two stripes.
So this unnamed driver pulls up to the booth and hands the collector the two stripe card. The collector looks at the new type bus and says this card is no good, you've got three axles. The driver realizes his mistake, and then remembers the 'special button'. He tells the collector to look again. The collector looks, and to his astonishment, now only sees one rear axle.
"Sorry, driver, my mistake", he says as he hands the card back. The driver grins and takes off. But as he gets a length or two away, he lowers the hidden tag wheels again, wishing he could see the look on the collectors face. Razz


Last edited by traildriver on Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:36 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Q65A



Age: 66
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 1764
Location: Central NJ

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL; great story!!! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

T.D. -

LAUGH RIOT of an "On The Road" story! Had the coach operator been a quick witted comic, there was more material here.
Should have dryly noted to the NJTP associate to, "Call the Police! Someone stole it while we were talking!" (Yeah, yeah!
It "...fell off the bus!..." <G>)

.....................Vern...................
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Transit Bus Manufacturers All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group