|
BusTalk A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mr. Linsky BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 5071 Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:57 am Post subject: 'THE 798 WHITE'S OF DETROIT' |
|
|
Pictured below is fleet number 4094 - a 1946 White Motor Company Model 798 and one of 125 (4011 to 4135) delivered to the City of Detroit Department of Street Railways in the spring of that year.
Detroit Street Railway (known more familiarly as 'DSR') has served the Detroit metropolitan area as a public trust since before the turn of the twentieth century and was a pioneer in rubber wheeled transportation as far back as the mid teens.
Never to be accused of partiality in its choice of equipment, the company selected their buses to meet the needs of each unique situation with fleets not only of Whites but Twin Coaches, Macks, GM's and even Fords for routes of least volume.
The 44 passenger amidships engined # 4094 is seen crossing Monroe Street as it makes its way north on Woodward Avenue and is signed for Southfield on the Hamilton Line.
Photo courtesy of the S. Sycko photo collection.
Mr. Linsky - Green Bus Lines, Inc., Jamaica, New York
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
timecruncher
Age: 73 Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 456 Location: Louisville, Kentucky
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Louisville had a sizeable number of these coaches, gasoline-powered, and purchased to replace streetcars on the heavy 4th Street route. I don't have any photos, but I recall riding on them.
LRwy had quite a bit of trouble with the trannies in the "big Whites," as they were known. Finally, they locked them into a torque-drive, and they were relegated to tripper service due to high maintenance and fuel costs. 25 new GM 5103's were delivered at the end of 1950 and early 1951 to take over base service on 4th Street.
The big Whites disappeared during major service reductions in the late fifties.
timecruncher |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RailBus63 Moderator
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 1063
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boston had some White 788's that made it into the MBTA era, complete with the circle 'T' logo. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Linsky BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 5071 Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's another page from the White brochure that I had added to 'The Great Race' thread that might interest you.
I never knew they were called 'Underslungs'!
Enjoy,
Mr. 'L'
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hankg42
Age: 73 Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 94 Location: The Villages, FL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I never realized that DeCamp was ever based in Staten Island (as seen on the above brochure). I always thought they were based in New Jersey (at least in my lifetime). I remember seeing lots of them in the Port Authority Bus Terminal. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Linsky BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 5071 Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
H.G.,
I saw that myself and wondered because I also always thought De Camp to be a Jersey outfit but figured that maybe they had shops or some kind of depot in Staten Island as well.
However, if you look through the very comprehensive history of the company at the URL (below), there is absolutely no mention of any Staten Island connection.
It could be that White made a mistake - they actually had no customers on the Island because Staten Island Coach, the major carrier, was devout ACF at the time.
That's all I can tell you.
Regards,
Mr. 'L'
http://www.decamp.com/about.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hankg42
Age: 73 Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 94 Location: The Villages, FL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Linsky wrote: | H.G.,
I saw that myself and wondered because I also always thought De Camp to be a Jersey outfit but figured that maybe they had shops or some kind of depot in Staten Island as well.
However, if you look through the very comprehensive history of the company at the URL (below), there is absolutely no mention of any Staten Island connection.
It could be that White made a mistake - they actually had no customers on the Island because Staten Island Coach, the major carrier, was devout ACF at the time.
That's all I can tell you.
Regards,
Mr. 'L'
http://www.decamp.com/about.htm |
Fascinating history. Thanks, Mr. 'L'! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fishbowl
Age: 76 Joined: 01 Sep 2010 Posts: 62 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, but I don't have anything smart to say about the White. The CTA ran them on Archer Ave. in Chicago when I was a kid, but I never rode one. I remember two things about the exterior:
1. The overhang above the windshield coupled with the upward curving lower sill made the front look angry.
2. The rear end had more vents than any bus I'd ever seen before. I mean, how hot did those engines run?!?
(Told you I had nothing to say.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Linsky BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee
Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 5071 Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
F.B.,
You're right about the 798 windshields but not for the same reason that I disliked them - with such a narrow scope of vision it would have given me claustrophobia had I been behind the wheel!
I can't account for the amount of rear venting except to say that it may have had to do with the fact that the engine was mounted amidships under the floor which, in of itself, created problems with fume leaks into the passenger compartment just as the ACF's did.
Regards,
Mr. 'L' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fishbowl
Age: 76 Joined: 01 Sep 2010 Posts: 62 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
fishbowl wrote: | The overhang above the windshield coupled with the upward curving lower sill made the front look angry. |
The pointy, "Mr. Burns" nose down the middle of the "face" didn't hurt, either. It added to the "scowl" appearance.
Thanks, Mr. L, for your helpful info, as always! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|