BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Bus loops - fading fast...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Photographs, Bus Logs and Route Suggestion Ideas
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
timecruncher



Age: 73
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 456
Location: Louisville, Kentucky

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 9:59 am    Post subject: Bus loops - fading fast... Reply with quote

32nd & Portland Loop is the last bus turn-around from the Louisville Transit era still in use. The turnaround at the west end of Broadway is still used, but it is pretty much a wide dead-end street with ample room for buses to make a "youie" in the street.

As Nabinut's photos show, many bus loops remain in Baltimore (BTC was famous for having multiple short-turn loops on many of their longest routes). There are a few here and there in Cincinnati and Columbus, Ohio, but mostly transit agencies have sold the property for development or abandoned the service areas entirely.

That is what happened in Louisville, at least.

Anyway, here are some photos from the timecruncher's archive, showing Portland Loop over the years of my experience. It is about to be given up to a church group that wants to build a new facility on the grounds. I, for one, don't like to see it happen, but my opinion and a dollar will get me a cup of coffee at White Castle!

This turnaround was one where two routes used it in different directions. Hill Street buses (now Route 27) looped clockwise, and Portland-Shelby buses (formerly Route 11, now Route 43) looped counter-clockwise. It required bus operators to hug the railing in both directions or the buses couldn't pass... Did I mention that Portland Avenue is one-way west? Yep - so even after the street was made one-way, the bus routes kept on looping in opposite directions.



One of the ex-Louisville Transit TDH4507s inherited by TARC, as I prepare to pull an eastbound trip around 7:00am on a warm Spring day in 1974.



A year later, the same place from across the street. I was again on the Route 27 bus, while my good friend Steve Cowan was driving the Route 11 Portland-Shelby bus. Can't advertise cigarettes or rotgut bourbon on buses anymore...



Pretty sure I've posted these pix before. Here is one a lot more recent. Again, its a 27 and this time a 43.

The small building is the only brick shithouse ever built for LTC, and is the last one standing. Soon even this will be history.

So anyway, more bus loops, anyone?

timecruncher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Hart Bus



Age: 74
Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 1150

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its very interesting that Fishbowl 875 had a sign frame attached to the a/c unit. Never saw that before on any NYC area buses or other places I've been to. Great idea to generate some revenue, but how did it affect/not effect the airflow to the a/c?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dsevil



Age: 50
Joined: 10 Dec 2009
Posts: 24
Location: Louisville, KY

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great phoos as always, Cliff! Especially the second one (918 and 875).

Also, use of "brick shithouse" = win.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hart Bus wrote:
Its very interesting that Fishbowl 875 had a sign frame attached to the a/c unit. Never saw that before on any NYC area buses or other places I've been to. Great idea to generate some revenue, but how did it affect/not effect the airflow to the a/c?

Hart Bus -

Agree. Good candidate for another entry in the, "It Seemed Like A Good Idea At The Time" file? <G>

With Loop Nostalgia, not to forget Capital Transit in Washington put up some very solid monuments,
back when they still had the power company backing them...

Baltimore, earlier U R & E, later B T Co a bit quirky. It is all clear why it was done the way it
happened, in readings of the history works...

..................Vern................
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
timecruncher



Age: 73
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 456
Location: Louisville, Kentucky

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The "canopy" billboards were removed when the a/c unit was set up for operation in late Spring every year. You can barely tell it, but the rooftop fan had a cover over it when this photo was taken in the Fall or Winter.

As you can see, the ad was a pretty flimsy affair. No, they didn't bounce around, but they could be added and removed fairly quickly.

Here is 802, TDH5303 from the original order, without the ad flap:



Looks as if they used the mounting holes for the evaporator cover to mount the arms that held the ad in place. Never noticed that before...

LTC was very particular about the a/c working on their new look fleet. Before Derby Day every year, every one of the new look coaches had been through the unit shop and the air conditioning system charged and checked for any problems.

The pre-1968 a/c units had a hydraulic compressor clutch that would not engage until the motor had warmed up sufficiently to allow oil pressure to drop when at idle. There was an oil pressure switch somewhere on those 6V71 Detroits that when working, prevented a driver from flipping the air conditioning on when the engine was revved up (this was a bad idea, because those big Carrier 3-cylinder compressors could be ripped out of their mount pretty easily and end up scattered in pieces all over the road if you did this. The hydraulic system also had to be checked out and filled with Dextron II before the unit could be turned on.

Oh, and for the rivet counters on this board, those taillights were made necessary because the original part became hard to get by the mid-sixties for some reason. I think they were originally Cats Paw lenses. At any rate, either they were too expensive or were hard to get, so LTC found an aftermarket taillight that fit on the engine doors and what you see is what we got. Ehh - they worked...

timecruncher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Sun May 30, 2010 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Buffalo still has a number of bus loops in service - there's a good list on the NFTA wiki page.

Syracuse has two loops left that I'm aware of, and only one of these (Nedrow) is still in everyday use.

The MBTA in greater Boston has several off-street terminal loops still in use (other than the numerous busways located at rapid transit stations). Watertown, Clarendon Hill and Arlington Heights are all located at former carhouse sites (the latter two sites were sold off and had large housing complexes built there). Charles River Loop in West Roxbury and Haskell (Woodlawn) Loop in Everett are two of the few remaining non-carhouse loops that are still being used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thaitransit



Age: 42
Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 40
Location: Mahachai City

PostPosted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just a friendly question: What is a bus loop?
is it just a place where the buses turn around?
Or is it a small bus terminal?

Would this be considered a bus loop?



Its a terminus of a major bus route in a narrow dead end street with a boat pier at the end of the street. the buses have to do a multi point turn to turn around.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
timecruncher



Age: 73
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 456
Location: Louisville, Kentucky

PostPosted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Loops at the end of transit routes generally were first built for streetcars as a way to turn them around. Most street railways did not use two-ended or bi-directional cars in the modern era (post-1930, when most cars were being re-configured for one-man operation).

Some places used a wye track to turn the cars, others had both (Cincinnati is a good example of this).

When streetcars were replaced by rubber-tired vehicles, motor buses or trackless trolleys, the loops generally were kept in place. Many transit systems would have rudimentary restroom facilities at these turnarounds as well. Louisville transit had very crude outhouse-type facilities at most of theirs, except for the Portland Loop, which had a nice brick building with heat!

Public transit authorities replaced private companies in the U.S. mostly during the sixties and seventies, and generally sold the property that these bus turnarounds sat on, because services were extended beyond them, and because transit managers of the era often as not did not understand the purpose or need for the bus loop.

Nothing like sitting down on a commode seat on a 20-degree winter day to make you feel all warm 'n fuzzy inside...

timecruncher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ripta42
Site Admin


Age: 45
Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1035
Location: Pawtucket, RI / Woburn, MA

PostPosted: Mon May 31, 2010 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hart Bus wrote:
Its very interesting that Fishbowl 875 had a sign frame attached to the a/c unit. Never saw that before on any NYC area buses or other places I've been to. Great idea to generate some revenue, but how did it affect/not effect the airflow to the a/c?


Loves Park (IL) Transit had them on their two 3302As.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
B53RICH




Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 254

PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've seen that photo of yours of 918 and 875 on another site some years ago.

NYC New Look Flxibles in the 7000 and 9000 series had ad racks mounted to their AC grills throughout the Manhattan depots during the 1980's. Many migrated to various other depots throughout the other boroughs during bus transfers. Fresh Pond Depot was one that received many. While at Fresh Pond, I recall a one-time ad change advertising the NY Knicks. Most of the other times, as many bus fans will remember, the AC ads racks read," Bus Ads Fit!"

Here is a photo from the BusTalk galleries of 7753, the only NYC Flxible with Busorama ads, on the M102 in June, 1982. Photographer unknown.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thaitransit



Age: 42
Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 40
Location: Mahachai City

PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

timecruncher wrote:
Loops at the end of transit routes generally were first built for streetcars as a way to turn them around. Most street railways did not use two-ended or bi-directional cars in the modern era (post-1930, when most cars were being re-configured for one-man operation).

Some places used a wye track to turn the cars, others had both (Cincinnati is a good example of this).

When streetcars were replaced by rubber-tired vehicles, motor buses or trackless trolleys, the loops generally were kept in place. Many transit systems would have rudimentary restroom facilities at these turnarounds as well. Louisville transit had very crude outhouse-type facilities at most of theirs, except for the Portland Loop, which had a nice brick building with heat!

Public transit authorities replaced private companies in the U.S. mostly during the sixties and seventies, and generally sold the property that these bus turnarounds sat on, because services were extended beyond them, and because transit managers of the era often as not did not understand the purpose or need for the bus loop.

Nothing like sitting down on a commode seat on a 20-degree winter day to make you feel all warm 'n fuzzy inside...

timecruncher


I assume "Street Car" is the same as "Tram" or "Tramway"

In my former hometown of melbourne australia Their tramway system is massive but never had such run around loops as even 100 years ago doubled end tram cars were in use. 1st pulled by "Cable" later by over head electric wires. today there around 40 routes with over 1000 km of track on the Melbourne system making it one of the largest tram systems in the world.

However today trams seem to behave more like high capacity buses on rails in that they offer the same style services as buses such as metro feeder and innercity main road route stopping every few hundred metres.

Regarding the Bus Loops. In Bangkok Thailand two such off street bus loops have been recently built as part of the new BRT busway system. That is basically an every 5 min bus service using separated lanes and railway height platform and a small amount of guideway track. But yes at each terminus is a turning point for the BRT buses and a couple storage areas for extra buses.

When the routes in the US were extended did they build new bus loops at the end or just relied on a 3 point turn at the outer terminus?

Why were the "Street car" routes removed from many of the US cities? Was it a case of just too run down as in Sydney Australia case i.e cheap ro replace with buses?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thaitransit wrote:
I assume "Street Car" is the same as "Tram" or "Tramway"


Correct - of course, now they are known as 'light rail'.

Quote:
When the routes in the US were extended did they build new bus loops at the end or just relied on a 3 point turn at the outer terminus?


In most cities, buses were often turned around by making several right-hand or left-hand turns down streets to eventually return the bus to the main street. An example would be Centro's route 20 service in Syracuse, New York - look at the map at the bottom right of page 1 to see how two routes loop around streets to reverse direction. In other cases, buses may terminate at an off-street shopping center and would loop around through the parking lot. I'm not aware of many instances when a new transit loop was built in the bus era.

Quote:
Why were the "Street car" routes removed from many of the US cities? Was it a case of just too run down as in Sydney Australia case i.e cheap ro replace with buses?


In the majority of cases, it was a matter of transit systems becoming less profitable by the 1930's and no longer being able to afford the capital expense of maintaining tracks and power systems or being able to afford new cars. There were also cases in some cities of the street railway system being owned by local power companies - Federal regulations in the 1930's forced utilities to choose between the electric generating business and public transit, and investors were more than glad to divest themselves from money-losing street railways.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RailBus63 wrote:
...In the majority of cases, it was a matter of transit systems becoming less profitable by the 1930's and no longer being able to
afford the capital expense of maintaining tracks and power systems or being able to afford new cars. There were also cases in
some cities of the street railway system being owned by local power companies - Federal regulations in the 1930's forced utilities
to choose between the electric generating business and public transit, and investors were more than glad to divest themselves
from money-losing street railways...


Rail Bus 63 -

Agree, subject minor exception. So good to see you have a way of stating it objectively! Else, so much of the junk and clutter on the 'Net
is hysteria and conspiracy theory driven. The Federal action noted in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Utility_Holding_Company_Act_of_1935

A reader needs keep in mind it was just one of many misguided pieces of legislation, fueled by a do gooding hysteria to smash all the trusts,
and any other Anti Trust evil doers. It was rather like Carrie Nation trashing saloons, in her anti-booze zeal.

It set up the opportunity for acquisition of large numbers of the transit properties. Now, the exception I note is that the "broad brush" term,
"...money-losing street railways..." inaccurate. It overlooks that many of the larger metro properties were good "earners", even at reduced,
Depression Era ridership.

The generally money losing properties largely in smaller secondary, and even smaller tertiary markets. That is: Result that National City Lines
was largely all about towns with needs for twenty to fifty units of rolling stock. Should we "broad brush" the entire industry as "money losing"
propositions, all this does is justify the present costly public finance methods. Or, if there is a habit to label all as losers, they will continue to
perform that way...

....................Vern...................
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HwyHaulier wrote:
It set up the opportunity for acquisition of large numbers of the transit properties. Now, the exception I note is that the "broad brush" term,
"...money-losing street railways..." inaccurate. It overlooks that many of the larger metro properties were good "earners", even at reduced,
Depression Era ridership.

The generally money losing properties largely in smaller secondary, and even smaller tertiary markets. That is: Result that National City Lines
was largely all about towns with needs for twenty to fifty units of rolling stock. Should we "broad brush" the entire industry as "money losing"
propositions, all this does is justify the present costly public finance methods. Or, if there is a habit to label all as losers, they will continue to
perform that way...


Good points, Vern. It's probable that more street railway systems would have survived into the 1970's had all decision-makers behaved in a more rational manner - certainly many of the cities like Detroit, Los Angeles, Chicago, etc. that had large fleets of PCC streetcars should have kept and modernized their major rail lines. Still, it seemed that transit executives in both big and small cities were captivated by the efficiency and modern comfort of the motor bus, especially when you consider the fact that public agencies such as those in Boston, Chicago, Detroit, New York City and others were not motivated by profits and nonetheless decided to scrap the majority of their streetcar and trolley coach operations in favor of buses during this period.

Jim
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HwyHaulier




Joined: 16 Dec 2007
Posts: 932
Location: Harford County, MD

PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RailBus63 wrote:
...Still, it seemed that transit executives in both big and small cities were captivated by the efficiency and modern comfort of the motor bus,
especially when you consider the fact that public agencies such as those in Boston, Chicago, Detroit, New York City and others were not
motivated by profits and nonetheless decided to scrap the majority of their streetcar and trolley coach operations in favor of buses during
this period...


Jim -

Indeed! we're on the same page. Should one look at the Chicago example, the public control was, at best, turbulent. There was the
scandal of the huge PCC order. Cars hardly in service, and City wished to end it all. And, so, the story of the odd little rapid transit cars.

Some of the large city agencies, where applicable, seemed possessed of a notion to act prudently, and try to deliver a net surplus, or
come close. We seem to lack this kind of attitude anymore. (IMHO, the Fed Free Lunch money is poisonous! The old, "Don't eat that
apple!
" parable?)...

Other factors adding to the mix. 1) The (who else) Fed mishandling of the value of the dollar. It fell by half in value, 1944 thru 1948.
(See Minneapolis FRB Inflation Calculator.) This set up primal urges to spend the increasingly worthless currency on tangible assets!

2) Despite all best efforts, overall ridership returned to patterns of decline post WWII...

3) The technology development that, circa 1950, the GMC bus was suddenly so efficient and economical, it rewrote most anything
anyone knew, should they follow the Transit Texts of 1940 and earlier. (Late production GMC TDx-45xx and TDx-51xx types peerless!)...

My point being: View it all as so many businesses. Pining over an old flame, the streetcar is pointless. Time goes on, like it or not.
It is all about cycles...

BTW. Side note. The "Utilities Act" compelled sales of small town lines. It was too good to be true. Take over a broken down, small
town line, get the empowering operating Certificates, too. Junk all of it, account prohibitive rebuild of existing plant. Sent in the new
coaches! Count the net money! It was just lovely, as long as it lasted!

.....................Vern...............
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Photographs, Bus Logs and Route Suggestion Ideas All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group