BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

[MA] MBTA to expand Silver Line (Mattapan service dead)
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Surface Transit - Eastern United States
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2009 10:13 pm    Post subject: [MA] MBTA to expand Silver Line (Mattapan service dead) Reply with quote

MBTA.com - Governor, Mayor Announce Silver Line Project

5/4/2009

As part of his Massachusetts Recovery Plan to secure the state's economic future, Governor Deval Patrick joined Boston Mayor Thomas Menino and Transportation Secretary James Aloisi today to announce federal stimulus funding to improve bus service along New England's busiest bus corridor and in neighborhoods currently unserved by rapid transit.

The two-stage bus rapid transit project will provide a direct Silver Line connection from Dudley Station to South Station in Boston this fall, and replace an existing heavily-used bus route from Mattapan to Ruggles Station with rapid transit bus service that will provide faster, more reliable service to tens of thousands of trips a day. The announcement comes after the recent announcement of the Patrick Administration "flexed" highway federal recovery funding to build a state-of-the-art regional transit center in Greenfield.

"With smart, strategic use of federal recovery funds we can bring rapid transit to some of Boston's busiest bus routes, connecting key neighborhoods and delivering reliable service for tens of thousands of commuters who rely on the MBTA," said Governor Patrick.

"Improving and expanding our transportation infrastructure is critically important to our economy," said Lieutenant Governor Timothy P. Murray. "Projects like these will not only benefit commuters but also the businesses that count on reliable service for their employees."

"I am proud to support this project because it will revitalize one of Boston's most important corridors and get shovels in the ground and people back to work," said Mayor Thomas Menino. "My administration is committed to helping the MBTA connect our neighborhoods more directly to Boston's financial district and creating more opportunities for our residents."

In the first stage of the initiative, the Executive Office of Transportation will use federal recovery funds to improve Silver Line service with a direct connection from Dudley Station to South Station, including the addition of dedicated bus lanes on Essex Street and a new, state-of-the-art street-level terminal at South Station with lighting, seating, heaters, and countdown signals to provide additional comfort to riders.

Concurrently, a mix of transit and highway federal recovery funds will also be used to enhance service along New England's busiest bus corridor in the neighborhoods of Roxbury, Mattapan and Dorchester. The existing Route 28 bus line will be transformed into first-class bus rapid transit service from Mattapan Station on the Red Line to Ruggles Station on the Orange Line with a direct connection to the Silver Line. Additional station facilities will be located along Blue Hill Avenue in Mattapan and Dorchester, as well as along Warren Street in Roxbury.

This new state-of-the-art bus rapid transit line will also feature dedicated bus lanes, longer "articulated" diesel-hybrid buses, and innovative design and technology features like "queue jumping" (allowing buses to bypass lines at traffic signals) and traffic signal priority to speed up service and dramatically improve reliability. In addition, federal transit stimulus funds will be used to invest in several upgrades to the Dudley Square Station.

The two-stage bus rapid transit project is will cost approximately $114 million, but it could change as the specific design is more refined. Of the projected $114 million, $76 million is for construction and the remainder is for planning, engineering, right-of-way acquisition, and other administrative costs.

"The development of safe and efficient public transportation is a job-creator and an energy-saver," said Senator Edward Kennedy. "This federal investment will mean increased access to downtown and faster commutes for thousands of Massachusetts workers and residents. I commend Governor Patrick for his efforts to ensure that public transportation in Boston and throughout Massachusetts is first-rate."

"This means jobs and economic development in communities that need a boost," said Senator John Kerry. "Faster, cleaner buses mean fewer harmful emissions and a better quality of life for the thousands of Boston residents who rely on public transportation for a safe, quick commute."

"I am pleased that Governor Patrick is using stimulus funding to address the needs of these neighborhoods. When completed, each of these BRT projects will offer better transit to residents, increasing access to employment and other opportunities," said Congressman Mike Capuano.

"These federal stimulus funds will not only create jobs but will dramatically improve bus service, making commutes greener, more comfortable and more efficient for thousands of MBTA customers each day. This is a perfect example of how state and local government can utilize stimulus funds to put people back to work while investing in public transportation," Congressman Stephen F. Lynch said.

"There were 10.7 billion trips on public transportation in 2008, and signs point to even greater use-and need-for mass transit in 2009. These funds will help reinvigorate vital public transit lines just as record numbers of people are choosing to take public transit. This funding is crucial to better mobility, cleaner air, and reduced traffic congestion for the people of Massachusetts," said Congressman Edward J. Markey.

"We are using federal stimulus funds to make a real difference for people who depend on bus service every day, whether it's for work, school or to get to a doctor's appointment," said Transportation Secretary James A. Aloisi, Jr. "With this forward-looking investment we can support economic growth, social justice and create better service for tens of thousands of riders."

"This project builds on the tremendous success of the first phases of the Silver Line by expanding that high quality, reliable bus service," said MBTA General Manager Daniel A. Grabauskas. "This project will also create jobs now, and spur economic development throughout these neighborhoods of Boston."

"Throughout the Commonwealth we are using stimulus funding to create new jobs, fix our deteriorated highways, and support economic development and public transportation to build a better future for our communities," said Governor Patrick's Director of Infrastructure Investment Jeffrey Simon. "In this way we can use short term dollars for long term economic investment."

This transit investment is part of the Patrick Administration's "You Move Massachusetts" civic engagement and transportation planning initiative, which included feedback from transit riders pleading for improvements to slow and unreliable bus service. Over the past few years, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority has invested in a wide variety of initiatives to improve bus service, including a state-of-the-art control center and GPS tracking on buses to lessen the impact of delays on customers. The stimulus projects will build on those improvements with the "next generation" of bus service.

To learn more, visit: www.mass.gov/eot.


Last edited by RailBus63 on Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:32 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill D




Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Waterbury, CT

PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It appears that the idea of tunneling under downtown Boston to complete the Silver Line is dead. The question that comes to mind for me is how "rapid" can a BRT route be through the Chinatown section of the city? Having driven through these streets, it would seem to be a real challenge operating service through the area.

Bill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Wed May 06, 2009 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed - the plan for bus-only lanes on Essex Street will help, but many of the intersections along the route are busy all day long, so it will remain to be seen if the new routing will be an improvement over the current Temple Street terminus.

What I'm hearing is that several of the Neoplan artics in the 1018-1044 group currently used on route 39 will be repainted in silver for the expanded service. Long-term, there are plans to purchase a group of hybrid articulated buses from New Flyer - these would be assigned to route 39 and would free up the remaining Neoplan artics to be assigned to the new Silver Line service from Mattapan to Ruggles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
timecruncher



Age: 73
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 456
Location: Louisville, Kentucky

PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wonderful, wonderful.

The government is giving MBTA lots of $$ so they can build nice shelters and buy pretty buses.

Is there any operating assistance forthcoming? Seems to me I read recently where the T is desperately short of operating funds and will have to make major service reductions in the near future to balance it's budget.

Makes good ink for politicians for a few days, then is meaningless when the result is a reduction in service for those who need it most at the expense of specialized service that the same people will have to use anyway.

I find it more and more appalling how we are played by both the media and our politicians.

timecruncher
(Coffee. I need coffee this morning to get out of this crabby funk!)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

timecruncher wrote:
The government is giving MBTA lots of $$ so they can build nice shelters and buy pretty buses.

Is there any operating assistance forthcoming? Seems to me I read recently where the T is desperately short of operating funds and will have to make major service reductions in the near future to balance it's budget.


From an operating perspective, the only change is the extension from Washington St. to South Station. I expect this will require two to three additional buses to maintain the present headway.

The 'new' service from Mattapan to Ruggles is the current route 28 bus. This is the fifth busiest bus route on the system and utilizes 14 buses during peak periods to maintain a seven to eight minute headway. Crowding is a major issue on this route, especially since the MBTA replaced RTS's with NABI low-floor buses in 2004. I would expect that the MBTA will make a big deal of the extra capacity that the Neoplan articulated buses will bring to this route while not actually increasing the number of buses.

This project is a mixed bag, in my opinion. I'm actually positive about the Silver Line extension to South Station and the use of articulated buses on route 28 is long overdue. The amount of money being spent for fancy bus shelters with LED countdown displays is disappointing, however - the current Silver Line shelters along Washington Street are laughable and offer zero protection during any storm, and the 'real time' display of bus arrival information has been spotty at best. I would prefer to see more of the money used to buy additional articulated buses in order for use on other busy routes in the system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ripta42
Site Admin


Age: 45
Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1035
Location: Pawtucket, RI / Woburn, MA

PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As the project website suggests,

"Please direct any questions or comments to planning@eot.state.ma.us"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Thu May 07, 2009 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was just looking at that website at lunchtime. I was surprised to see that the South Station service will be in addition to the current downtown routing via Temple and Tremont Streets. It's not clear if trips will alternate between the two or if additional service will be added from Dudley to South Station.

It's also interesting to see the conceptual drawings for the route 28 service - consideration is being given to putting bus-only lanes in the middle of Blue Hill Avenue with center passenger islands and buses running against the flow of regular traffic (separated by a barrier, I presume).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bill D




Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 332
Location: Waterbury, CT

PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 4:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RailBus63 wrote:
This project is a mixed bag, in my opinion. I'm actually positive about the Silver Line extension to South Station and the use of articulated buses on route 28 is long overdue. The amount of money being spent for fancy bus shelters with LED countdown displays is disappointing, however - the current Silver Line shelters along Washington Street are laughable and offer zero protection during any storm, and the 'real time' display of bus arrival information has been spotty at best. I would prefer to see more of the money used to buy additional articulated buses in order for use on other busy routes in the system.


Jim,

I agree with your assessment of this plan. The extension of Silver Line service to South Station is a reasonable proposal compared to the previously proposed tunnel under downtown, which would have been deep enough to hold billions of taxpayers dollars, and would have taken years to actually build. It is realistic that the new route could be up and running by September of this year, as the report indicates. The "real time" bus arrival information seems like a total waste to me. If service is provided every few minutes, is it really necessary for passengers to be able to count down the seconds until the bus arrives at their stop. On a recent trip to Boston, I observed at least 4 buses on Route 1 (Harvard - Dudley) pass through the same block of Massachusetts Avenue traveling in the same direction in a 2 minute span. It seems that money could be better spent to have a few good starters on the streets, to help maintain headways along the routes, and keep buses from traveling in packs like I observed.

The real question that comes to mind for me is - is this really bus rapid transit? In an urban setting such as Boston, when service is being operated in mixed traffic, how "rapid" can the bus operate? For example, if you look under Transit Projects at the EOT site, the proposals for the Route 39 corridor provide at best a 5 minute improvement over the length of the route. While the the proposals will certainly provide faster bus service, it seems that the MBTA is pushing the BRT concept in an effort to appease residents who had serivce taken away, as when the Orange Line elevated was removed from Washington Street. They were promised equal or better replacement service, but a bus route operating on city streets will never be able to compete with a system independent from street traffic.

While the left handed running proposal for Blue Hill Avenue seems workable, I would hope that there would be more than just pavement markings to separate buses from the street traffic. Otherwise, it is a potential disaster in the making. The queue jump at intersections is also an interesting concept, but I wonder how one gets automobile traffic to cooperate?

It will be interesting to see how this plan develops.

Bill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Schedule enforcement on the MBTA bus system has been a joke for years. Drivers are given a departure time for each trip and that is it. I was actually surprised when I moved to Syracuse to see that Centro drivers actually adhere to midpoint times on the schedule and will pull over and wait if they are running early. Busy MBTA routes such as the 1, 39, 70 and 111 are notorious for bus bunching, yet I cannot recall ever seeing a bus short-turned.

The perfect example of this was a Saturday busfanning trip my son and I took in 2005. We visited Waltham Center in hope of shooting RTS buses on the 70 route as well as new NABI's on the 500-series routes. The NABI's more or less arrived on schedule, but a grand total of one inbound 70 showed up in 40 minutes despite the route having a 10-minute Saturday headway. Of course, what happened next was a conga line of five outbound RTS's showing up in less than five minutes. I have one picture of the second bus in the line in which the third and fourth buses can be seen less than a block away. A large crowd of inbound passengers waited at the stop, but all five buses proceeded to continue on their outbound trips. It was clear to me that MBTA supervision either had no idea that this backup was occurring or knew and simply didn't care, since I don't believe the T's union has such sweet work rules that prevent runs from being short-turned. The MBTA made a big public pronouncement a few weeks ago that all buses are now equipped with GPS devices, but I will wait and see before I'm convinced that they are capable of using this technology to improve bus dispatching and supervision.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ripta42
Site Admin


Age: 45
Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1035
Location: Pawtucket, RI / Woburn, MA

PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bill D wrote:

The real question that comes to mind for me is - is this really bus rapid transit? In an urban setting such as Boston, when service is being operated in mixed traffic, how "rapid" can the bus operate? For example, if you look under Transit Projects at the EOT site, the proposals for the Route 39 corridor provide at best a 5 minute improvement over the length of the route. While the the proposals will certainly provide faster bus service, it seems that the MBTA is pushing the BRT concept in an effort to appease residents who had serivce taken away, as when the Orange Line elevated was removed from Washington Street. They were promised equal or better replacement service, but a bus route operating on city streets will never be able to compete with a system independent from street traffic.


Sadly, any limited stop route with an alternate paint scheme can be sold as BRT in this country (although it helps to further fool the consumer if you use really aerodynamic-looking coaches - dubbed WCVs, or "Way Cool Vehicles" in the planning world). IMO, nothing should be called "BRT" unless it runs on dedicated and preferably grade-separated right-of-way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ripta42
Site Admin


Age: 45
Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 1035
Location: Pawtucket, RI / Woburn, MA

PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 8:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RailBus63 wrote:
The MBTA made a big public pronouncement a few weeks ago that all buses are now equipped with GPS devices, but I will wait and see before I'm convinced that they are capable of using this technology to improve bus dispatching and supervision.


More than likely, they will just spend a few more million so you can look at the bunched buses on your computer. Maybe MBTA will also follow Chicago's example and include fleet numbers, so fans can post systemwide bus sightings on message boards in real time!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ripta42 wrote:
Maybe MBTA will also follow Chicago's example and include fleet numbers, so fans can post systemwide bus sightings on message boards in real time!


Now that would be WAY COOL!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The new service from Dudley to South Station begins tomorrow:

MBTA Schedule page - SL4 - Dudley Station - South Station at Essex Street via Washington St

The existing Dudley to Downtown service is now known as the SL5. The SL1 and SL2 are the Silver Line services which operate via the Waterfront transitway (there was an SL3 as well but it was cancelled due to low ridership).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I somehow missed this back in November - the planned 28X enhanced service from Mattapan to Ruggles is dead due to community opposition:

No agreement, no $147m upgrade - State scraps effort to seek US funding for bus line

This situation is a microcosm of the problem that transit advocates face these days. Reading the article, it appears that the riders were generally in favor of the improvements but were woefully under-represented in the hearings, while other residents were more worried about parking and not being to cross the street anywhere they liked (jaywalking is rampant in Boston - check out the photo with the article). I’ve also heard that the Boston Fire Department was opposed because some current left-hand turns would have been eliminated by the new bus lanes.

Meanwhile, the local politicians were up in arms because … the governor’s office didn’t tell them in advance about the press conference announcing the project.

The 25 New Flyer hybrid artics are still coming, but it is unclear if the current 28 service will receive these now – I’ve heard that the equally crowded 23 Ruggles-Ashmont route might receive these buses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ctrabs74




Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RailBus63 wrote:
I somehow missed this back in November - the planned 28X enhanced service from Mattapan to Ruggles is dead due to community opposition:


I don't know who irritates me more: the idiots on Beacon Hill who, in typical Mass. fashion, bungled a major opportunity or the people opposed to the idea.

As someone who grew up in New England, I'm more inclined to blame the pols in this case...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Surface Transit - Eastern United States All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group