BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Roosevelt Island Tram/QB Ry/Subways/Els
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> General Transportation - All Other Modes
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

N4 Jamaica wrote:
Thanks for the explanation of major PCC repairs at the DeKalb Carhouse. i was unaware of it.
The research that went into creating the 1936 PCC was extensive and expensive, yet this photo shows one of the early blunders: the inward-folding doors and the support column that constricts wide passengers. Nicely, the roller signs were larger than on many New York streetcars.
---
Please challenge me if I am wrong: The Chicago Green Hornet PCC crash that took the lives of 34 people had two such doors in the front, one in the center, and three at the rear for quick loading and fare collection.


Joe:

You are quite welcome; years of researching many books and online photos/articles have helped me to gain a tremendous amount of knowledge regarding New York's mass transit network in past decades.

Of course, there are many in the hobby who know far, far more than I do.

Regarding Brooklyn's PCC's, when you see a photo today off a PCC "off line", that particular car was on a fan trip, running on lines that never saw revenue PCC operation (like the routes that ran over the Williamsburg Bridge into the underground Delancey St. terminal)

You also inquired about the horribly fatal CTA "Green Hornet" wreck; here's a very detailed article that will give you much information......

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-per-flash-greenhornet-0624-20120624-story.html

"NYO"


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:23 pm; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe:

Here is another article......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1950_Chicago_streetcar_crash
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are several photos of various Chicago PCC's; it is interesting to note how "exotic" they looked, compared to Brooklyn's fleet.....

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?20841

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?46019

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?49881

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?57457

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["22 CLARK-DEVON"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
N4 Jamaica




Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 858
Location: Long Island

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CTA 7034 is given a 1940 date. Can't be date of photo, since CTA was organized in 1947. Note the door configuration, 3 +2. Much faster loading than the transit buses GM or Flxible built for years and we still suffer from. Our single doors waste time and operator salaries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

N4 Jamaica wrote:
CTA 7034 is given a 1940 date. Can't be date of photo, since CTA was organized in 1947. Note the door configuration, 3 +2. Much faster loading than the transit buses GM or Flxible built for years and we still suffer from. Our single doors waste time and operator salaries.


Joe:

In 1940, the CMCCo (Chicago Motor Coach) was the largest operator of buses in Chicago; though operating a massive fleet of streetcars, the CSL also operated some bus routes, and also, a number of trolley bus routes.

Regarding door sizes (I totally agree with you in your opinions); in 1940, FACCo took delivery of a one-of-a-kind Old Look demo (#2500) which featured double-width front doors.

The BoT's "Bingham" MACKS had double-width front and rear doors; the City's TDH-5101's (1948) had double-width front doors.

Ditto the 1948 ST. LOUIS trolleybuses, which ran in Brooklyn.

I've also read that buses which were equipped with double-width front doors were often referred to as "muzzle loaders" by drivers.

"NYO"

[23-CORTLEYOU"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This picture dates to 1959 (the year before Brooklyn's trolleybuses would make their final runs); here we see trolleybus #3165 at the Williamsburgh Bridge Plaza, during a quiet period.....

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?153305

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["47-TOMPKINS"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Only Chicago operated rapid transit cars with the type of doors that would seem more appropriate for a bus or a streetcar.

Several CTA car series once utilized such doors.........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?14315

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?14599

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?143393

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["SKOKIE"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is interesting to note that not all B&QT PCC's retained their original headlight "wings" during their service lives.

Some cars kept them for the duration of their days in Brooklyn; other cars, at one point or another (perhaps during overhauls) lost them forever.

Still others had their "wings" removed, only to have them replaced at some later time........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?117369

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?115226

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["69 MCDONALD"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2023 11:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another distinctive feature that Brooklyn's PCC fleet lost over the years was the small flashing "NEXT CAR" light on the dash......

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?141887

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?140746

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["68-SMITH ST."]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brooklyn's postwar trolleybuses carried a large illuminated "NEXT BUS"/"CAR FULL" sign, on the left side of the front sign box.....

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?156111

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["57 FLUSHING AVENUE"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

According to "BROOKLYN TROLLEYS" (Greller/Watson) the 6100-series single-ended Peter Witts were equipped with "an electric 'NEXT CAR' sign on the front side panel".

However, in looking at a number of photos of these cars, I see side destinations signs, but nothing for "NEXT CAR"........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?117805

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?117815

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["FULTON"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 4:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After the massive BMT elevated terminal at Park Row was torn down in 1944, the multiple streetcar loops beneath the structure were now exposed to the elements.

Note the elderly deck roof car (#3740) on the left, sans trolley poles.

This retired car was brought to Park Row (w/trolley poles removed), and had a power cable installed to connect to the overhead, to provide light and heating for waiting passengers, during inclement weather.......

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?117588

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["GATES AV"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's a photo of "shelter car" #3740 in 1940, while still in regular service; this photo was snapped at the Rockaway depot...........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?117589

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["ENTER AT REAR"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This rare color photo of "shelter car" #3740 (Park Row) shows the car devoid of signage; as mentioned previously, the car has been shorn of its trolley poles, and an electrical cable now connects the car to the power lines, to provide electricity for lighting and heat........

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?33324

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["PARK ROW"]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 22649
Location: NEW JOISEY

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another view of the Park Row streetcar loops, post-1944, after the BMT El terminal above had been torn down.

It is odd that these loops were never roofed over, to protect waiting passengers from the weather.

Clearly, during the busy rush periods, more than one lone "shelter" car would be needed to provide shelter to waiting passengers ("shelter" car #3740 is seen parked on the far right)

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?140682

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["B&QT"]

_____________________________________________________________

This photo was snapped just prior to the last El trains crossing the Brooklyn Bridge in 1944.

Here a train of gate cars is seen departing the cavernous Park Row terminal, soon to be demolished..............

https://www.nycsubway.org/perl/show?113224

(courtesy: nycsubway.org)

["LEXINGTON"]


Last edited by NEW YORK OMNIBUS 2629 on Mon Mar 13, 2023 11:16 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> General Transportation - All Other Modes All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 13, 14, 15 ... 24, 25, 26  Next
Page 14 of 26

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group