BusTalk Forum Index BusTalk
A Community Discussing Buses and Bus Operations Worldwide!
 
 BusTalk MainBusTalk Main FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups BusTalk GalleriesBusTalk Galleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

'THE 798 WHITE'S OF DETROIT'

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Surface Transit - Eastern United States
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mr. Linsky
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 5071
Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 1:57 am    Post subject: 'THE 798 WHITE'S OF DETROIT' Reply with quote

Pictured below is fleet number 4094 - a 1946 White Motor Company Model 798 and one of 125 (4011 to 4135) delivered to the City of Detroit Department of Street Railways in the spring of that year.

Detroit Street Railway (known more familiarly as 'DSR') has served the Detroit metropolitan area as a public trust since before the turn of the twentieth century and was a pioneer in rubber wheeled transportation as far back as the mid teens.

Never to be accused of partiality in its choice of equipment, the company selected their buses to meet the needs of each unique situation with fleets not only of Whites but Twin Coaches, Macks, GM's and even Fords for routes of least volume.

The 44 passenger amidships engined # 4094 is seen crossing Monroe Street as it makes its way north on Woodward Avenue and is signed for Southfield on the Hamilton Line.

Photo courtesy of the S. Sycko photo collection.

Mr. Linsky - Green Bus Lines, Inc., Jamaica, New York

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
timecruncher



Age: 73
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 456
Location: Louisville, Kentucky

PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Louisville had a sizeable number of these coaches, gasoline-powered, and purchased to replace streetcars on the heavy 4th Street route. I don't have any photos, but I recall riding on them.

LRwy had quite a bit of trouble with the trannies in the "big Whites," as they were known. Finally, they locked them into a torque-drive, and they were relegated to tripper service due to high maintenance and fuel costs. 25 new GM 5103's were delivered at the end of 1950 and early 1951 to take over base service on 4th Street.

The big Whites disappeared during major service reductions in the late fifties.

timecruncher
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
RailBus63
Moderator



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 1063

PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Boston had some White 788's that made it into the MBTA era, complete with the circle 'T' logo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Linsky
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 5071
Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's another page from the White brochure that I had added to 'The Great Race' thread that might interest you.

I never knew they were called 'Underslungs'!

Enjoy,

Mr. 'L'

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hankg42



Age: 73
Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 94
Location: The Villages, FL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I never realized that DeCamp was ever based in Staten Island (as seen on the above brochure). I always thought they were based in New Jersey (at least in my lifetime). I remember seeing lots of them in the Port Authority Bus Terminal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Linsky
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 5071
Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 1:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

H.G.,

I saw that myself and wondered because I also always thought De Camp to be a Jersey outfit but figured that maybe they had shops or some kind of depot in Staten Island as well.

However, if you look through the very comprehensive history of the company at the URL (below), there is absolutely no mention of any Staten Island connection.

It could be that White made a mistake - they actually had no customers on the Island because Staten Island Coach, the major carrier, was devout ACF at the time.

That's all I can tell you.

Regards,

Mr. 'L'

http://www.decamp.com/about.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hankg42



Age: 73
Joined: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 94
Location: The Villages, FL

PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr. Linsky wrote:
H.G.,

I saw that myself and wondered because I also always thought De Camp to be a Jersey outfit but figured that maybe they had shops or some kind of depot in Staten Island as well.

However, if you look through the very comprehensive history of the company at the URL (below), there is absolutely no mention of any Staten Island connection.

It could be that White made a mistake - they actually had no customers on the Island because Staten Island Coach, the major carrier, was devout ACF at the time.

That's all I can tell you.

Regards,

Mr. 'L'

http://www.decamp.com/about.htm


Fascinating history. Thanks, Mr. 'L'!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fishbowl



Age: 76
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 62
Location: Detroit

PostPosted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, but I don't have anything smart to say about the White. The CTA ran them on Archer Ave. in Chicago when I was a kid, but I never rode one. I remember two things about the exterior:
1. The overhang above the windshield coupled with the upward curving lower sill made the front look angry.
2. The rear end had more vents than any bus I'd ever seen before. I mean, how hot did those engines run?!?



(Told you I had nothing to say.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr. Linsky
BusTalk's Offical Welcoming Committee



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 5071
Location: BRENTWOOD, CA. - WOODMERE, N.Y.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

F.B.,

You're right about the 798 windshields but not for the same reason that I disliked them - with such a narrow scope of vision it would have given me claustrophobia had I been behind the wheel!

I can't account for the amount of rear venting except to say that it may have had to do with the fact that the engine was mounted amidships under the floor which, in of itself, created problems with fume leaks into the passenger compartment just as the ACF's did.

Regards,

Mr. 'L'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fishbowl



Age: 76
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 62
Location: Detroit

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fishbowl wrote:
The overhang above the windshield coupled with the upward curving lower sill made the front look angry.

The pointy, "Mr. Burns" nose down the middle of the "face" didn't hurt, either. It added to the "scowl" appearance.

Thanks, Mr. L, for your helpful info, as always! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    BusTalk Forum Index -> Surface Transit - Eastern United States All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group